New Blood Test for TB Could Save Millions of Lives

As much as one third of the global population is currently infected with the bacterium that causes tuberculosis (TB), a disease typically concentrated in the lungs and characterized by weakness, fever, coughing and chest pain. About 9.6 million new infections occurred in 2014, the most recent year for which numbers are available. Roughly 1.5 million people died of TB that same year. The ability to easily, inexpensively and accurately diagnose TB is of utmost importance, but the most commonly used method fails, at least to some extent, on all three counts. A new blood-based technique might considerably rein in this epidemic.

The conventional TB test scans for bacterial DNA in coughed-up mucus, or sputum. But some children struggle to produce a sample on request. The test also can miss TB in people simultaneously infected with HIV because the telltale bacteria may exist in numbers too low to detect or outside the lungs. In addition, the test costs up to $10, a prohibitive fee in many developing countries. As a result of these constraints, a large percentage of TB cases are diagnosed late or not at all, leaving serious infections untreated and more liable to spread.

Two years ago the World Health Organization put out a call for an improved TB diagnostic. In response, Purvesh Khatri, a Stanford University medical professor, and his colleagues combed through the human genome and found three genes that distinguish active TB from other diseases. The team then developed a way to detect these genes in blood.

According to their study, published in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine, the test is equally sensitive among patients with and without HIV coinfection and correctly detected TB in 86 percent of pediatric cases. Additional points in favor of a blood assay include that it can be performed at a clinic and yield same-day results, unlike the case for a sputum test. That is especially advantageous in the developing world, where showing up for even a single appointment presents a tremendous burden. “You want to be able to initiate treatment immediately,” says Sheela Shenoi, a Yale University professor of medicine focused on AIDS.

The technology has not been used in the diagnosis of new patients and may be difficult to scale up, but in the meantime, Khatri has filed a patent for the test. He thinks it could cost less than half as much as the current one. “If this three-gene signature could be developed into a point-of-care test,” Shinoi says, “it would revolutionize TB diagnostics.”

New research shows that women who never sunbathe are twice as likely to die than those who do so regularly

Researchers at the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, say guidelines that advise people to stay out of the sun unless wearing sunscreen may be harmful, particularly in northern countries which have long, cold winters.

Exposure to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight is often cited as a cause of skin melanoma (malignant tumour of melanocytes) and avoiding overexposure to the sun to prevent all types of skin cancer is recommended by health authorities.

But the new study, which followed nearly 30000 women over 20 years, suggests that women who stay out of the sun are at increased risk of melanomas and are twice as likely to die from any cause, including cancer.

It is thought that a lack of vitamin D may be to blame. Vitamin D is created in the body through exposure to sunshine and a deficiency is known to increase the risk of diabetes, TB, multiple sclerosis and rickets.

Previous studies showed that vitamin D can increase survival rates for women with breast cancer while deficiencies can signal prostate cancer in men.

The study looked at 29518 Swedish women who were recruited from 1990 to 1992 and asked to monitor their sunbathing habits.

After 20 years there had been 2545 deaths and it was found that women who never sunbathed were twice as likely to have died from any cause.

Women who sunbathed in the mild Swedish summer were also 10% less likely to die from skin cancer, although those who sunbathed abroad in sunnier countries were twice as likely to die from melanoma.

Yinka Ebo, senior health information officer at Cancer Research UK, said striking a balance was important.

“The reasons behind higher death rates in women with lower sun exposure are unexplained . overexposure to UV radiation from the sun or sunbeds is the main cause of skin cancer.”

Thanks to Kebmodee for bringing this to the attention of the It’s Interesting community.