25% of scientific statisticians report being asked by their colleagues to commit scientific fraud

Posted: January 3, 2018 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

As the saying goes, “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” We know that’s true because statisticians themselves just said so.

A stunning report published in the Annals of Internal Medicine concludes that researchers often ask statisticians to make “inappropriate requests.” And by “inappropriate,” the authors aren’t referring to accidental requests for incorrect statistical analyses; instead, they’re referring to requests for unscrupulous data manipulation or even fraud.

The authors surveyed 522 consulting biostatisticians and received sufficient responses from 390. Then, they constructed a table (shown below) that ranks requests by level of inappropriateness. For instance, at the very top is “falsify the statistical significance to support a desired result,” which is outright fraud. At the bottom is “do not show plot because it did not show as strong an effect as you had hoped,” which is only slightly naughty.

On the right, the authors report how often the biostatisticians estimated that they received such a request over the past five years. The results are jaw-dropping.

The absolute worst offense (i.e., being asked to fake statistical significance) occurred to 3% of the survey respondents. Another 7% reported being asked to change data, and a whopping 24% — nearly 1 in 4 — said they were asked to remove or alter data. Unequivocally, that is a request to commit scientific fraud.

Of the less serious offenses, 55% of biostatisticians said that they received requests to underreport non-significant results.

This article has been republished from materials provided by the American Council on Science and Health. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Reference
Min Qi Wang, Alice F. Yan, Ralph V. Katz. “Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians.” Ann Intern Med 169(8): 554-558. Published: 16-Oct-2018. DOI: 10.7326/M18-1230.

https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/news/1-in-4-statisticians-asked-to-commit-scientific-fraud-311329?utm_campaign=NEWSLETTER_TN_Breaking%20Science%20News&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=68543465&_hsenc=p2ANqtz–8ZbNt7sDLF6bujB3qX9CeJA-hpSQwPHeSLoR5Ju1WYXA6SnOEepdO0o-J7qw_1aGB3nfwldpf30hV3pAvVi7SzJa8fw&_hsmi=68543465

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s